Q: I would like to know what I have to do to become a registered NHS Acupuncturist. I am a qualified acupuncturist. I studied with the CNM college.
We are not sure that there is such a thing as a registered NHS acupuncturist. Our members have sought for years to achieve some form of recognition, either by way of statutory regulation or by way of recommendation from statutory bodies, and the best that we have managed to achieve at a national level is the use by NHS Choices of the BAcC's register as the 'go to' place to find a traditional acupuncturist. This was very much premised on the fact that the BAcC has been accredited by the Professional Standards Authority under its Assured Voluntary Register scheme.
Other than that we have many individual members who have managed over the years who have managed to gain contracts for services with specific NHS departments or consultants in their area, but the recession has seen a significant fall in the number of these. Where NICE guidelines have made room for the use of acupuncture, as in the currently hotly challenged NICE Guideline for Back Pain, what little take up there has been has been through work being offered to practitioners like physiotherapists who are already employed within the system.
And more than that, we are afraid, we cannot say.
Q: I live in the south west of London area, and I am just trying to find out if there is a acupuncturist treatment on the NHS. I am unemployed at the moment, but I can get a referral from my GP.
A: We are sorry to say that there is not a great deal of acupuncture provision on the NHS. Some doctors and physiotherapists inside the NHS use acupuncture but this tends to be restricted to their normal scope of practice and generally is only allowed for specific treatments for which there is a good evidence base. This tends to rule out the use of acupuncture for general well-being and for those areas which are our stock trade, where there is substantial lower grade evidence but not a great deal of gold standard trials. We, of course, are not happy with using an inappropriate standard as a yardstick, for reasons which are too complex to cover here, but that is the situation.
There are also a number of Pain Clinics which routinely offer acupuncture treatment, and your GP could refer you to these if your problems fell within their general scope.
We are assuming that your circumstances are such that you need treatment to be free at point of delivery. We doubt that you will find many of our members who are able to offer treatment for nothing, but all of us have at various times taken on patients at highly reduced fees because we want to ensure that treatment does not become a kind of middle-class preserve because those on low incomes or the unwaged cannot afford it. This is a matter of personal choice, and if you ask around there may well be practitioners within relatively easy reach who could off some kind of deal - we have over 500 members in Greater London.
Some members have also started to set up what are called multibed clinics to try to provide acupuncture at relatively low cost, often £10 - £15. A list of such clinics can be found at http://acmac.net/acu/clinics, and the ACMAC website makes for interesting reading. The standard of treatment remains high, but obviously being treated in a community setting does not quite offer the same levels of individual care or privacy that one to one work offers. However, it does mean that acupuncture becomes more widely available.
We hope that you manage to track down someone who can help you.
Q: I've had treatment for my neck,shoulders,and back. After the treatments I feel great but when I wake up the next day I feel achy and tired.
A: This is not an unusual reaction after treatment. We often alert patients especially after the first and second session, that they may experience a resurgence of the pains they have had to an even greater extent. This is not a bad thing, and if nothing else shows that the treatment is having an effect. Since lasting adverse effects are very unusual after treatment it is usually a good sign. We only get concerned if an episode of tiredness and achiness lasts for a great deal longer or if the pattern continues without any discernible improvement in the problems for which someone came to treatment.
The mechanism for this is not clearly understood. Since Chinese medicine is premised on a flow of energy, called qi, there are explanations which borrow the analogy of chilblains which can be very painful when they are warmed up after a walk in the cold. Not a very positive analogy but gets across the idea of a circulation being restored not always being a comfortable process. More plausible is the fact that treatment is aimed at restoring proper function in the body, and ultimately this will impact on structure. If the body starts to realign then various muscle groups are going to rearrange themselves. Treatment is also aimed at expelling pathogens, and we often find that the outward travel of these can make someone feel like they are on the edge of a cold.
However, whatever the explanation in either system of medicine, we can reassure you that this is not uncommon, and while we would not want to state as a general principle that things sometimes get worse to get better, it is a frequent enough event to be predictable in cases of muscular problems in the neck and back.
The only other factor which we would explore is whether someone is cashing in their 'feeling good' after treatment by over-doing it a little. The mild euphoria and relaxation after treatment Is quite common, and we do find that people can sometimes take this sense of well-being down the gym or into the park for a run. We usually advise our patients to take it easy after treatment while the system is in flux, and leave it time to settle.
A: This is not as easy as you might think.
Very few of our members are now contracted to provide acupuncture services within the NHS. Although in theory the change to commissioning groups should have given GPs more flexibility in how they spend their budgets, at the same time these budgets were cut and a series of cuts equivalent to one doctor per practice are now in mid flow. Such contracts as do exist mainly develop from personal friendships between consultants or GPs, where there is a good understanding of the longer term benefits of acupuncture.
In theory you could look at the websites of the two largest medical acupuncture bodies, the British Medical Acupuncture Society and the Acupuncture Association of Chartered Physiotherapists. This gives you potential access to about 9000 practitioners but the reality is that you would need to get a referral to a physio who also does acupuncture or to a doctor within your practice or nearby practises. This may not be as easy as it sounds, since all are bound to a degree to work within scope and where there is an evidence base for the condition being treated. Given that the bar for this is set high at the entirely inappropriate randomised double blind trial, the chances of a match are poor.
We are assuming that your need for an NHS acupuncturist is driven by finances, and apologies if we have guessed wrong. Most of our members are willing to make concessions in case of genuine financial hardship and an increasing number are now operating out of community/multibed clinics, a list of the main ones of which can be found here http://acmac.net/acu/clinics. It may be worth checking out what can be obtained locally at low cost because once you look at the whole package, including travel time and costs, a modest fee may well still be within your range.
Q: I wondered if there was a list of NHS approved acupuncture treatments that can be carried out by GP's /doctors. In other words, what the NHS recognises as a treatment of equivalent quality to that of conventional western medicine? I have seen the WHO list on your website but going through NHS choices website, it seemed quite restrictive. Also what is the professional level of care provider in the NHS that can offer acupuncture, I presume it is more than nursing level, and is at GP/Doctor level?
A: This is quite a complex question that touches on one or two controversial (within the acupuncture profession!) issues.
As far as the use of acupuncture by conventional medical practitioners is concerned, the usual requirement for inclusion within scope of practice is evidence at the level of randomised double blind control trial. For several very cogent reasons this is not a very appropriate mechanism for testing what by its very nature is a dynamic and evolutionary diagnostic and treatment process - diagnosis informs treatment which it turn further refines diagnosis. It would be highly unusual to use a single point prescription ad nauseam.
However, in the medical versions of acupuncture this is certainly how the process is viewed, and where trials are conducted on this basis it is considered acceptable to use acupuncture within a conventional framework. There are only two areas - chronic low back pain and cluster headaches - where NICE has adopted acupuncture as a firm recommendation. There was a ' near miss' for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee, where the evidence was good but the evidence for the 'sham' control group was nearly as good. Both were better than conventional treatment but the evidence of efficacy depends on outstripping the sham. Apart from that there are a few trials for post-chemotherapy nausea, dental pain and a couple of minor conditions which meet the criteria. These, at least, form the list which the Advertising Standards Authority allows us to talk about.
In practice, however, most codes of conduct inside statutory registers say that a registrant can do pretty much what they please as long as they can provide satisfactory evidence which assures them of patient safety and qualified efficacy. As you will have seen from the WHO website there are thousands of Level 2 trials which show positive results for acupuncture treatment, and many conventional practitioners extend their work in this field. The deterrent from radical use is that their protected title is at risk, on which basis a great deal of professional judgement and latitude is extended by the regulators.
As you can imagine this has become something of a hot potato as physiotherapists have started to extend their repertoire into areas like fertility treatment and internal problems which can only by a stretch of imagination be regarded as within the traditional scope of practice. There is also an increasing number of osteopaths and chiropractors extending their scope of practice, although there is nothing to indicate that this is at all included within their basic skill set. However, if they are taken to task and can show evidence that it was a legitimate extension of their skills based on reasonable evidence they would be unlikely to face censure. Our argument has always been that finding out that something was wrong after it has gone wrong is no way to run a railway, and that particularly in matters of safety where the standards are clearly defined it would make sense to enforce basic standards as a condition of use. However, acupuncture remains such a safe treatment that the risk, and therefore the urgency, is seen as less pressing.
Our members get understandably upset, and see this as a form of subtle encroachment. Our slightly wider view is that at the moment the 'cake' which we are all sharing of prospective patients is minute in comparison to what we believe the overall use of acupuncture could and should be, and that rather than arguing about poaching we might be better advised to work together to create a much larger cake. However, there is a great deal of professional pride at stake where someone has trained to degree level for three years and then sees a person with a weekend's training offering to treat the same problems.
This abuts on your second question. Because acupuncture can be practised as a free-standing independent system or as a simple adjunct for specific circumstances (like the use of acupuncture in childbirth by midwives) you will find no simple statement of levels of attainment for its use. The basic line is that a practitioner must understand the scope of their practice and the limits of their competence, and know precisely what to do if they are out of their depth or if something goes wrong. This means that there are many nurse practitioners and low level use practitioners as well as doctors and physios who have usually undertaken significant training, although none as comprehensive as the WHO guidelines except by choice in a few cases.
This again is something of a debating point in the traditional acupuncture world. Since medical acupuncture does not have a great deal of content, it is quite common for conventional practitioners to cherrypick elements of traditional acupuncture, and this kicks of very lively debates about how safe it is for a practitioner to use a tiny part of the overall system. Would we be allowed, it is argued, to learn how to do a specific surgical procedure? However, we tend to take the view that this is going to happen increasingly as acupuncture is practised more widely because it is effective, and it is better for us to guiding the process and helping people to recognise their limitations than standing and taking pot shots at non-traditional users. Not a unanimous sentiment, it has to be said.
This is obviously a very complex field and we cannot hope to cover all of the subtleties here, but we hope that this has given you a flavour of the issues involved,
If you have any questions about acupuncture, browse our archive or ask an expert.
Research based factsheets have been prepared for over 60 conditions especially for this website
Catch up with the latest news on acupuncture in the national media
Keep up to date with our news or join the #acupuncture conversation
Thinking about trying acupuncture?
Have a look at our Frequently asked questions, browse our video testimonials or the Ask an expert area
63 Jeddo RoadLondon W12 9HQPhone: 020 8735 0400
Fax: 020 8735 0404
© British Acupuncture Council 2016