Latest posts are at the bottom of this page.
Use the filter buttons above to help find answers - click on the boxes

Ask an expert - body - cancer

17 questions

Q:  I work with cancer patients and am trying to establish how many sessions of acupuncture each person should have according to your protocol

A: We're not quite sure what you had in mind for a 'protocol for treating cancer.' Traditional acupuncture is primarily a generalist practice which treats people rather than conditions, and we suppose the answer that we would normally give would be along the lines of 'treatment specific to the unique problems of the individual for as long as it takes for the person to achieve the optimum result from treatment.' Clearly with treating many cancer patients this is not a matter of reversing their problems, but more often a matter of addressing some of the worse side-effects of their treatment and of trying to help their inner state as the disease progresses. As long as someone still feels that they derive benefit from treatment we would continue to treat.

 The question of numbers of treatments only usually arises where resources are scarce and someone sets a limit, often quite arbitrary, to the number of sessions that someone can have. In some cases, like the NICE recommendation for the treatment of low back pain, the number of sessions (ten) is not far away from what we might consider sufficient to have an impact. In other conditions, though, a fixed number makes little or no sense. Some migraine sufferers respond quickly, others take a long time because their problems are multifactorial. To say 'six sessions and done' would make no sense.

You may find, or already have found, that some NHS facilities do treatment which is a little more protocol based, but there are very few protocols in our work which both define a named condition and a set number of sessions to address it. That does not mean that we expect to be given a blank cheque to work as long as we like. Sometimes treatment works well, and sometimes it doesn't. It is absolutely vital to try to establish measurable outcomes and to review progress on a regular basis to ensure that there is some value in carrying on. With degenerative problems this can sometimes be a quite odd determination, like 'getting worse slower', but the question always has to be posed.

 Site Name

A:  We are often asked about specialists in treating certain kinds of problem, and the answer is always the same - from a traditional Chinese medicine perspective we are all generalists because we treat the person, not the condition. Indeed, in ancient times the specialist was looked down on as a rather unworthy being because they only treated a small range of problems! In reality, there are a number of areas like paediatrics, obstetrics and mental health where we are investigating how to accredit expert practice because we do recognise that in each area there is supplementary knowledge and experience which is not a part on undergraduate training, but this does not mean that only these people can treat these groups. The difference is between good and better.

The nature of Chinese medicine is that the symptom or presenting condition has to be seen in the context of the person's overall health or balance. This explains why twenty people with the same named condition might be treated in twenty different ways. In reality, though, there is quite great deal of research using slightly more formulaic points which can help the problem of chemo-induced neuropathy. Western research tends to eliminate variables, so treatment protocols tend to be repetitive, unlike most practice which is evolutionary and developmental.

There is a systematic review found here

which looks at all of the studies which have been conducted, and tends to be a little bit negative, although conceding that there are studies which look promising. Part of the reason lies in the fact that many Chinese studies, of which there are thousands, tend to be more concerned with what works better than with whether acupuncture works, and these tend to be dismissed as methodologically weak, hence the almost universal request for 'more robust' studies. The reality is that the gold standard of research in conventional medicine, the randomised double blind control trial, is not best suited to testing a therapy with many variables, so results are always going to be strange. The more the treatment fits the conventional structure of testing, the less it looks like what we do.

Anyway, enough carping about research! Most of us have had successes quelling the worst aspects of neuropathy, but we have also had our failures. It is very important to review treatment to avoid a subtle accumulation of many treatments, and equally important to try to find measurable outcomes to test whether there really has been progress. On this basis a course of acupuncture treatment will certainly not do any harm, and will probably do some good. The question is really how much good and how sustainable.

To find a practitioner geographically closest the best thing to do is to use the postcode search facility on the BAcC home page. We have just  tried it and generated thirteen hits on SO22 and SO23, so we are sure that you will find a suitable practitioner close to where you live. Most of our colleagues are happy to invite people in for a chat before committing to treatment, and this is often the best way to establish whether someone is the practitioner for you.

Q: My wife has been suffering. from a  brain tumour for the past six years. She has had two surgeries and two radio therapies having been operated ten days ago. Doctors say tumours may recur in future. Can it be prevented by acupuncture treatment is it safe and can it be treated along with allopathic medicine?

A:  We are sorry to hear of your wife's predicament.

We have to be honest and say that there is no evidence that we have, either formal through studies or informal through anecdotal accounts, that acupuncture treatment could prevent the recurrence of brain tumours. We would not even be able to say how this could be measured; sometimes tumours simply do no recur and it would be impossible to determined whether something like acupuncture had been central to this happening.

The best that we can say is that acupuncture treating done according to traditional principles is aimed at balancing up the whole system to optimise its functions in the simple belief that a system in balance is  better equipped to deal with symptoms as they arise. This may have the impact of improving someone's ability to deal with quite aggressive conventional treatment, and may even have the effect of slowing down the progress of a chronic degenerative condition. More than this, though, we could not say.

Each person is different, however, and the only real way to get a sense of what may be possible for 'non-standard' conditions like this is to visit a practitioner and have a face to face chat so that they can see what is going on with the whole system. Most BAcC members are more than happy to sit down with a prospective patient for a short chat without charge to assess the potential benefits of treatment, and we hope that your wife is well enough to make such a visit.

As far as safety is concerned, acupuncture remains one of the safest forms of treatment around, with some of the lowest incidences of adverse events. It can also be used successfully alongside conventional treatments, and all acupuncturists are trained to ensure that they take conventional treatment into account when formulating treatment plans, especially when this treatment can render a patient immuno-compromised and not quite so well defended as they would normally be. You can read about acupuncture safety as


Q: Please can you advise me if there are any contraindications to using acupuncture during conventional treatment of breast cancer in a woman aged 25?
For example, could it cause any conflicts during chemo or radiotherapy therapy treatment? I have researched the positive effects and do not find much in the way of acupuncture opposing treatment in anyway. 

A:  There is, as you say, quite a bit of evidence gathering for the use of acupuncture to treat the side-effects of chemotherapy, as you can see in the relevant sections of our factsheet on nausea

There is also a growing body of evidence for the treatment of chemo-induced neuropathy, although not quite robust enough for us to make claims of efficacy.

In general, the use of acupuncture to help with the side effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy is becoming well established within cancer treatment centres. The only contra-indications we have ever encountered are to do with the treatment of the limb beneath where lymph nodes have been stripped. In mastectomies and even some lumpectomies the lymph nodes under the armpit are stripped as well, and the received wisdom is that treatment of the affected arm creates an enhanced risk of infection, especially if the person has lymphoedema as a consequence of the removal of the glands. 

There has been a considerable amount of argument inside the profession about this, because in China doctors happily treat the affected limbs with acupuncture, and we can find no evidence of any 'smoking gun', a case where infection has been attributed to acupuncture treatment. We strongly suspect that this arose from the view of a small number of consultants and in the absence of evidence either way everyone has played safe. This is not an impediment to treatment, however. One of our colleagues, Beverley de Valois, has published several very authoritative studies showing that treatment according to traditional principles using substitute points elsewhere on the body has been just as effective as local treatment. A full list of her publications is to be found here:

The main factor which we have to bear in mind is that someone being bombarded with chemicals and radiation is immuno-suppressed and may not have as much resistance as the average patient. As a result we take special care with such patients, and may, for example, routinely swab all points before needling where normally we rely on professional judgement. Our health and safety consultant was always emphatic, though, that following our Codes of Safe Practice to the letter was a guarantee of safety from cross infection.

There is no evidence, either, of conflicts with any other forms of conventional treatment, as in trying to restore cells which the conventional treatment is trying to destroy. Because we are working from a different paradigm the treatments are aimed at different levels of function within the body, and do not cancel each other out.

If you do decide to have some acupuncture treatment, and we believe it will probably offer some real benefits, you can discuss this in depth with your practitioner. Our members are well informed on areas like this, and have had to address similar concerns on many occasions.

Q:  We have a family friend who is suffering from severe pain in his knees as a result of advanced cancer. The hosiptal has stopped treatment as there is
nothing they can do as a result he is just on medication from the local GP to reduce the pain, which  doesn't seem to be that effective. Would acupuncture be
something that could help, block / reduce this pain?

A:  Acupuncture for the treatment of chronic pain has a long history, and also some reasonably good evidence of success, as our factsheet shows  After Nixon's visit to China in the 1970s a great deal of
research was done into acupuncture and pain control after the sight of people having surgery without anasethetic. The measurements of the neurotransmitters
involved in normal pain relief are easily measured, and this fitted well with the standard research models. Much of the evidence showed that acupuncture
treatment in addition to conventional treatment had a significant impact.

From a Chinese medicine point of view, pain arises from the blockage or weakness in the flow of energy, or 'qi' as it is called. The skill of the practitioner lies in knowing precisely why the blockages or weaknesses are occurring, and treating to ensure that the problem is addressed at source. If the local problem has a systemic source, then treatment needs to be addressed at the system as a whole, which is why a similar pain in twenty patients can be treated in twenty different ways according to their individual

As far as your family friend's case is concerned, we are confident that acupuncture treatment would have some effect, and our main concern would be exactly how much effect and how sustainable that effect is. All forms of acupuncture, both traditional and western medical, would expect to be able to provide temporary relief, but it would then be a balance between the extent and duration of the effect and the cost of achieving it. Acupuncture treatment would certainly do no harm, and since we treat the person as much as the pain itself there may even be some secondary benefits to the system as a whole.

The best advice we can give, and which we do almost every time, is that a visit to a BAcC member local to you will undoubtedly give you/them a much better indication of what may be possible. What we do not know, and which limits our comments, is the kind of cancer from which he is suffering and how much the pain is a reflection of metastases in the area. If the cancer lies in the bone itself that may have a significant impact on the efficacy of treatment, and may also restrict to a degree where needles can be placed. A skilled practitioner will be able to give you a much better assessment by looking at what is happening, and by asking a few more direct questions.

Page 1 of 4

Post a question

If you have any questions about acupuncture, browse our archive or ask an expert.

Ask an expert

BAcC Factsheets

Research based factsheets have been prepared for over 60 conditions especially for this website

Browse the facts

In the news

Catch up with the latest news on acupuncture in the national media

Latest news